As long as Eddie and Adam are viewing this thread, I have a question as it relates to ski construction. In the world of bicycles, much ado is made about the brand of carbon being used, the strength of the carbon, and the layup used in the manufacturing process. In contrast, very little marketing goes towards suggesting why the frame design of one manufacturer is superior. Trek talks about OCLV - their open compaction, low void exclusive process to remove the gaps in the fiber strands and thus improve consistency and strength. Pinarello talks about their asymetric layup due to the fact that the cranks and hub are on the right side of the frame. I could go on, but I think you get the point.
in skiing, we seem to be focused on the rocker, bevels, etc. We seem to regard all carbon as more less the same. Goode is now talking about Nano carbon, and whether that's the beginning of what I'm referring to as a means of differentiation, or whether there's some truth to it is really the basis of my long winded question. Thanks, guys!