Jump to content

JAYK

Baller
  • Posts

    56
  • Joined

  • Last visited

JAYK's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/15)

  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1.  GARBAGE IS THE FUTURE!!!! The Mr. Fusion Home Energy Reactor converts household waste to power the time machine's flux capacitor and time circuits using nuclear fusion (specifically cold fusion.) Mr. Fusion allows the DeLorean time machine to generate the required 1.21 gigawatts needed to travel to any point in time. The energy produced by Mr. Fusion replaces plutonium as the primary power source of the DeLorean's time travel and flight capabilities, allowing the characters to bypass the arduous power-generation requirements that the plot of the first film hinged upon. It is never mentioned what Doc Brown did with the remaining plutonium, or if he used it all during unseen trips after he leaves Marty near the end of Back to the Future part one. http://www.bttfblog.com/images/back_to_the_future_delorean_for_sale/delorean_time_machine_rear2.jpg
  2. Reading that same book now, it's good. Mental training is something that can be worked on outside of skiing, I found that learning to focus during the off season helped loads and a routine before I ski whether in training or tournament helps.
  3. Happy birthday John, Hope it's a good one!
  4. Awesome job! The website looks great!
  5. Just got back from a week of skiing on my new WR and it rocks! Everyone owes it to themselves to try it!
  6. Will Asher, Bob Lapoint, Dave Goode, Susi Graham, Doug Ross and the future Mrs John Horton! oh yeah and Karina Nowlan!!!
  7. 3 skis, carbon, carbon/bamboo and a wide ride... http://www.reflexworld.com/2009/slalom/slalom.htm
  8. Sorry! My mistake, I thought CS was customer service not Chad Scott, me and my retail brain...
  9. Scoke I vote a 66", email Dave, not CS and see what he says. Scot How do you feel that it's "too big"?
  10. Scoke, I am 6'1" 185lb, ski at 36, but heavily trying to be convinced to ski 34. I skied on a 66" 166 amp 36 mph RFF model. I am LFF, couldn't be picky, free demo. I skied it at 34 and 36, one of the things that I liked was the fact that it carried speed very well trough the turn, no stalling at the finish. When I skied it at 34 this was a huge difference compared to every other ski I tried this year, which was too many according to my wife. Without great detail of any sort, I REALLY liked the ski. My new WR just arrived down south, so in two weeks I will get to ride it again. Before I ordered it I emailed Dave Goode and he suggested the 66" 146 amp model for me, besides the fact of weight/height I also inquired about skiing in colder water all the time, the warmest our lakes gets is mid 70's and that doesn't last long, so temp in my mind is a factor also. I got a few different ponits of view, one "big dawg" skier told me to be on a 64, another pro said 66, buddies always have lots of opinions, but who better to listen too than the man himself, I'll find out in a couple weeks!
  11. Hypothetically if the pro's skied 34, 41 would be going down a lot more, I just don't think the talent pool is there for the crop of skiers @ 34 right now. No disrespect to anyone, it's incredible enough to see 39 ran that much in tourneys!
  12. Animal, thanks for the congrats! And yes I was on the Goode when I did it. ÂÂ
×
×
  • Create New...