Jump to content

giantjoe

Members
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • Preferred boat
    2000 Mastercraft X5
  • Ski
    CFR Charger, P-6

giantjoe's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/15)

  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Hi! I've been off the site for a while, but this summer I got very into skiing again. Above is a sample of my skiing (2000 Mastercraft X-5 @ 34mph 15' off using a Radar P-6). Below is a history lesson... I've been skiing for about 10 years. When I started, I was 6'6" and about 230-235. Started with a 69" HO CFR Charger (circa2010). I liked the ski for as much as I knew, but wanted to learn the course. @Chris Rossi suggested I use a P-6 at low speed to learn the course, so I got one and used it. In fact, I used it exclusively and never touched the Charger again. Until this year... I lost 30ish pounds, and my strength has increased a bunch. I feel that the P-6 is a nice feeling ski, but crossing the wake is a bounce-fest. The Charger seems to me to cut too sharply. It feels like it wants to make j-turns, while I would prefer a s-type turn. I only open water ski as the lake will not permit a course, but I do like to try to stitch 7 turns together in rapid succession. I think I'll be keeping the weight off, so it makes sense that I'd like a shorter ski as well as a thinner profile. I am open to all thoughts and suggestions (and of course critique of my video). I'm under the impression right now, that RADARs allow you to choose your turn radius depending on your lean angle, while other skis have their set radius that you have to adapt to. thanks in advance
  2. The thing I don't like about DI engines is that they're loud. My MINI sounded like a diesel...
  3. I find the P-6 fine to get up on, it's an easier ride than my older HO CompFreeRide. I can ski the P-6 slow if I want, like really slow 28-. The HO needs to be over 34 or else I'm sunk. The P-6 is cheap and you get the nicer Radar bindings. I have size 15 feet and they fit well. The P-6 can ride nicely in open water and is aggressive enough for the course. I'm not sure how it handles rough water since I rarely ski after 10 AM. I suggest a 71" P-6 it will do you no wrong and can be easily had for less than $300.
  4. I like my Radar bindings much more than the HO ones I have. Remember these are low end bindings, but comfort still trumps on the Radars.
  5. I'm 40, 6'6" and now down to 220! (from 230), I have a 71" P6 and it's what I'm learning on. I've learned deep water starts on it, it's good enough for the course, and you can ride it slow (like 26-28mph slow) if you want. I also have an older 69" HO Comp Freeride (Triumph type ski), that I ride in the free water at 34MPH+ otherwise it sinks. The P6 is cheap and effective, good ski. Here's a thread I started a while back... http://www.ballofspray.com/forum#/discussion/10538/learning-the-course-235lbs-69-ski
  6. I've got a young family. My 6yo tubes, but the wife and I get up every morning for a few sets of slalom each, then take the boat out later in the day for surfing or general tomfoolery. We've got wakeboards and a wake skate, but primarily slalom and surf. Although, I've been known to ride an air mattress on occasion..
  7. @Horton which is embarrassing the setup or my skiing? I think a thread dedicated to the most messed up jerry rigged setup would be hilarious.
  8. How about showing what a crappy setup we have now? Like this?
  9. I've got a 71" P-6 so they probably do make them...
  10. Shuswap in Calgary demos. They're really good guys.
  11. I previously couldn't log in with Safari Version 8.0 (10600.1.25.1), on Yosemite 10.10.1 (14B25). I can now. I didn't do anything on my end, just tried to login. And succeeded!
  12. 2000 Mastercraft X-5 (195) approx 600 hours and all is well.
×
×
  • Create New...