Jump to content

MustangSally

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

MustangSally's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/15)

  • First Post
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. @Than_Bogan.....What is the lake in Boston called? Maybe this guy could get some help from those folks, afte rall it would be the same state allowing things in one lake and not the other. I think this info could help this guy.
  2. I think I read in one article that the course had been in for like 23 years, but was recently removed due to all the hassle. The guy must have removed it and did the right thing while getting it permitted. I wonder if the prescriptive easement would work if it has been removed?
  3. Wow.....All to common. Everything is slowly getting squeezed out by complaining, selfish people. Did some research on this whole topic with this Fuhrman guy. It seems he has had a submersable course in this lake for many years. Rumor has it more than 20 years! Never one single complaint or police call in all those years. I bet someone new moved to the lake. We are all familiar with the bad eggs. The jealous people. This lake is small, but it appears it does Not get a lot of traffic. ( ski lakes for tournaments are often much smaller than this) It seems the lakefront homes have boats and they do water-ski and drag people around with tubes, but yet they have a problem with Fuhrman doing so? Are people this miserable in the northeast? I can see some people being shocked with this permit process if it were a brand new venture, but by the sounds of things, someone stirred up trouble with an existing course that had been there for many years without trouble. Even this towns admin said he has never had complaints from this lake ever until now. ( info and news found online) I know fighting city hall is no fun and maybe it is not worth the fight for Furhman, but... if an existing course had been there that long ( licensed or not ), I would think there may be some laws in his favor. In 20 years, I would bet the enforcement agency for that lake, has seen the course ( if they haven't, then they don't do their job very well). City workers, state workers, towns people, etc, have all seen it for many years. Not one complaint about it in all those years? the state never said it needs to be removed? the city or town never requested it be removed? If it is such a hazard, how could it be allowed and overlooked for so long? Very sad this is such a fight for him. We all know how tiresome slolom sking is. I am sure this guy just skies for a few passes and then is done. Submersable course? ski and sink the course to the bottom. why such a fight? I bet the guy has a few bucks or a nicer home, nicer boat, etc. Jealous people suck. Need a private lake to escape them. or a very ski friendly public lake.
×
×
  • Create New...