Jump to content

Does Pro Water Skiing need “John McEnroe” characters or not?


Recommended Posts

  • Baller
8 hours ago, jjackkrash said:

I used to love the whole Connors/McEnroe vibe in pro tennis.  And there is nothing wrong with “colorful” in any sport, IMO.  But I just don’t see a lot of crossover potential for that same Connors/McEnroe vibe in skiing.  And I don’t think tourney officials are down for the type of abuse McEnroe laid on the line judges.  It's hard enough to get people to work tourneys as is.  

I was just a kid, but even then I just wanted to watch the dang sport. If I want to watch people argue and complain I can tune into any of those ridiculous Housewives shows (I assume)...Or a soccer match or LeBron James checking for bleeding on his head when he wasn't even hit. 🤪

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Drago the phycology  was the interesting part not the arguing, but how Connor would push Mc Eroes buttons with witty little remarks the timing was perfect.

But I  do realise it wouldn't crossover to water skiing.

Or though in the past there were skiers that were very good at mind games with certain other skiers, ie comments about the wind, something strange going on at bouy 3 etc, I  not sure that it goes on now, but I  am pretty sure at the time, the likes of Wade Cox and  Andy Mapple, we're skiing that sort of thing was in play.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

Nautique had a perfect opportunity to shine with Jacinta's success.  They could've publicly embraced her record, and expressed disappointment it didn't happen behind one of their boats.  

Instead they looked like the kid that took his bat and ball and left the playground because he struck out.

I've been a Nautique guy for decades, but this was embarrassing.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_
Posted (edited)

Nautique dropping Travers is messed up. The skiers were being forced to ski in dangerous conditions and Jon was advocating for safety - that is not a "bad boy/selfish sports star" move, that's a responsible effort to benefit/protect everyone. And in terms of the alleged "gesture," it's worth remembering that Jon wears clinchers so he couldn't have raised his middle finger even if he wanted to. And the best proof he was justified in his frustration? Dane goes out after him and gets hurt 😑

It's funny, which skiers are sponsored by which boat manufacturer has almost no bearing on what boat I want. But the way Nautique has treated their skiers (Jacinta and Jon) makes me never want to buy a Nautique. Count me #TeamMasterCraft

Edited by Slalom.Steve
  • Like 6
  • Heterodox 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Slalom.Steve you have no idea what transpired between the appointed officials and why they skied in the windy conditions.  If a person was not there to see or hear the whole story and why things happed they way they did it is best not to comment on this subject of the 1st MCQ.  Every skier involved has n the runoff did not have to ski knowing there was the LCQ the next weekend   There has to be some personal accountability for your own actions  

I love the passion JT has for the sport just a very poor outcome   

As for J. Travers and nautique  this is really nobody else’s business.  


 

  • Like 1
  • Heterodox 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
On 5/30/2024 at 11:30 PM, vtmecheng said:

Athletes should be allowed to argue a case and show passion, just as in most sports. Taking that away makes things much less interesting. Inappropriate gestures and language can’t be tolerated but passion or pleading a case should be allowed. Skiers should be allowed to say an opinion during an interview. We should see if two skiers don’t get along. Controversy, passion, and conflict are interesting in all sports. People love to hate other players and teams as much as they love to follow their favorites. Also, no skier should ever feel they can’t ski their best because of the boat brand at a tournament. Next a Masterline skier won’t be allowed to ski their best at an event using an SLines or HO rope.

Great point regarding athletes not feeling able to ski their best or break a record behind a rival boat. Which is why Joel said that this helped his decision to sign up with MC..

And I also remember pro skiers of the 70’s and 80’s having some pretty strong personalities and charisma. Plus they occasionally did not to see eye to eye with each other! Financial gain tends to do that, which is why we have become used to seeing today’s skiers get along so well and appear much more easy going. When you ski more for the love of the sport and the glory of winning vs the 💰 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I do miss the overall titles.  
I believe that it created a lot of drama on the water and usually came down to the last few jumps to decide the best complete skier of the day. 
 

Drama on the water is much better than drama in the judge’s perch.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

So boat manufacturers who sponsor a skier capable of breaking records will fire that skier for breaking a record behind a competitors brand.  They would then rather fire and lose that talent than congratulate them and encourage them to continue training behind the boat that got them to that record breaking moment, and hope they will break their record behind their boat the next time.  Instead lets say goodbye the skill and talent and find somebody else who may or may not be record capable.  I'd bet the brand that wins is the brand that employs the talent.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

That video is from my era and I may have rose-colored glasses but those sure seem like the days.  Pro skiers then were like Gods on the water and we all wanted to emulate them so badly.  Skiing seemed a little more exciting then and even a little more dangerous.  Jump skis were 72" and OTFs were common.  Tricks wasn't a bunch of flips and skiers had to learn a lot of ski lines, 540s and 720s to be competitive and somehow it seemed just as hard then as it is now.  Even slalom seemed to have greater spills and thrills.  New technology and evolution in general has made skiing safer and in a way, more predictable.  The scores today in all 3 events are fantastic but the energy then seemed more exciting.  @RAWSki I agree with you about the excitement of Overall at the Masters.  It should be brought back!

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@UCFskier

I don't know if it was better then. I mean jump was better then because men were men, skis were short and you had to make your own speed without a 6.2 l boat 😁

seriously, I don't think you can look at that video and critique the culture of the sport. what I do see is that an overall tournament was successfully boiled down into a 1-hour video. it's a thousand times better than what the Masters broadcast.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
20 minutes ago, Horton said:

@UCFskier

I don't know if it was better then. I mean jump was better then because men were men, skis were short and you had to make your own speed without a 6.2 l boat 😁

seriously, I don't think you can look at that video and critique the culture of the sport. what I do see is that an overall tournament was successfully boiled down into a 1-hour video. it's a thousand times better than what the Masters broadcast.

I can say for certain that I'd consume far more waterski video media if the tourneys were cut down to videos like that.  I'd like the last completed pass for each skier before their final pass, just because those are often heroic scrambles.  The TWBC crew does a fantastic job filling the dead time during the live broadcasts, but as someone who usually watches after the tourney is over, the ESPN format is killer.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller
8 hours ago, UWSkier said:

I can say for certain that I'd consume far more waterski video media if the tourneys were cut down to videos like that.  I'd like the last completed pass for each skier before their final pass, just because those are often heroic scrambles.  The TWBC crew does a fantastic job filling the dead time during the live broadcasts, but as someone who usually watches after the tourney is over, the ESPN format is killer.

I agree   Big TWBC supporter here....   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_

Watching the highlights clip, and as noted previously, the final pass only doesn’t work for me, pullout and a couple of buoys then next skier offers no flow of the event.  TWBC does a great job so not a complaint, simply a suggestion on my part that would peak my interest.  I am sure they are messing with formats & ideas to provide us another great product to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

@DW

there is no easy answer.

On one hand, I miss a lot of the events because they happen at the same time I am skiing or driving the boat or driving to and from that lake. Watching 2 or 8 hours of replay is a commitment.   

On the other hand I agree with you that I want to see more of the passes. 

Just saying that ESPN show was pretty good. Maybe too compressed but in 1 hr I saw a whole masters 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I personally watch water skiing broadcasts to see actual water skiing and to learn from the expert analysis offered by TWBC announcers. The ESPN video devoted more air time to interviews and commentary than skiing itself, and by a wide margin. Skiing should be the main focus in my view.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...