Jump to content

Who wins?


lpskier
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Baller_

Skier A runs 38. Coming around six ball at 39, A gets a ton of slack, but makes it back to line of boat guides before popping the handle. A does not go through the gates. B runs 38, runs 39 and out the gates. B throws the fist and skis back to the dock. What is the result and why? 

  • Like 1

Lpskier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_

It’s a tie. But skier B has to buy the beer for being a dumbass. 
Same score for both skiers, no extra points for getting out the gates vs only getting to line of boat guides. Assuming skier B continued and got outside of 1@41 he would have been the winner. Getting outside of 1 is not a given at 41. 

At regionals or nationals that would be a runoff assuming 6@39 placed in top 5. 

at any other tournament the winner would be determined By single highest score but no one would care. Especially since skier B would be buying the beer. 

If it was easy, they would call it Wakeboarding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

There's  a couple things going on here, may be a trick question. 1st, most generally if the skier gets to the guide bouy line after any turn bouy, but pops the handle,  it's scored a 1/2. That's a skier safety feature built into the scoring and the skier is considered to not be in skiing position.   2nd, skier B was foolish to not confirm skier A's score before deciding not to continue. To be sure he should have taken his 41 shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

I yield to Meteo. Slack line after 6 ball is addressed differently in IWWF rules and not in AWSA rules or addendums. So if tournament is sanctioned L or R IWWF rules apply resulting in a tie. If sanctioned as AWSA E or C, skier B wins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_

@Drago 0@41 is the same score as 6@39, so still a tie if skier B goes inside 1 ball.

@ETskier you raise a valid point that idk if lpskier intended or not.  The so called "safety feature" is another dumb idea IMO and only adds additional confusion.  If the judges call skier A as 5 1/2 if he did not have a "tight line" when he got to the line of boat guides, then skier B is the winner and not a dumbass afterall.  

IMO the rule change to require a "tight line" was a really bad idea, but another topic from what I think lpskier intended?

  • Like 1

If it was easy, they would call it Wakeboarding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

@Dragomy bad wording. I knew what you meant, but the 0@41 beating 6@39 made too much sense to not be the rule. Stupid rule.

@Bruce_Butterfieldwould B have to turn back in? Or would a 1/4 buoy be scored? When is a 1/4 buoy recognized? 

I’ve got nothing but questions that just show that I’m obviously not familiar with the rule book. Laziness or ignorance on my part, but thank you guys for answering anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_

@Dragoagreed.

From the scorer's and winner's perspective 6@39NC is the same score as 0@41.  Not exactly fair, but that's the rule.  The last thing we need is ANOTHER rule for oddball cases like this.

So @lpskier is this what you were looking for?

I had disagreement with the slack line rule from the beginning.  Too confusing and way too much intepretation to be consistent.  After it passed, I learned that the reason for it was some ultra short line guys were getting to the line of boat guides AHEAD of the boat, creating an obviously very dangerous situation.  IMO, the better solution would be to disqualify the skier for creating a dangerous situation, the same way a jumper is disqualified for passing between the boat and ramp.  Get back to the line of boat guides with the handle in your hand (behind the boat), let it go, or try to hang on and fail, should score the full buoy.  But my opinion isn't the rule.

If it was easy, they would call it Wakeboarding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

In the scoring book both scores would be 114 assuming it is 36mph. It’s a tie.

i am not sure why the slack line rule doesn’t apply to 6 ball and why it was perceived less dangerous…

One part of the rule that is usually misunderstood and I witnessed being judged wrongly, is that 

1. it doesn’t apply to 6 balls

2. At buoy 1 to 5, skiers only get half a buoy with a slack line, even if they ski away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller_

This interesting hypothetical came up in a discussion  in a judging clinic last weekend. Since the slack line rule does not apply at six ball, the question is whether a “completed pass” (AWSA rule 10.01) trumps  six no continuation. The answer is  “six is six,” and our hypothetical skiers would tie. 

Lpskier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Baller

From what was discussed the win is completely determined by score, and since they score the same it's a tie.  Seems reasonable enough on the surface.

Clearly skier B had a better outcome but due to the weird 6 ball rule it doesn't matter.  You'd also have the same situation if skier B turned 6 crossed, the boat guide line and didn't make the gates but skied away.

The weird 6 ball rule seems like the cause but the situation could still happen even if it were changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...