Baller Stevie Boy Posted May 9, 2019 Baller Share Posted May 9, 2019 Hi Guys on the Radar site they give long/shallow and short/deep fin numbers for the Vapor but only one set of numbers for the Senate, somebody has mentioned Rossi Numbers for the Senate but I cannot find them unless they are the stock numbers. Any Info ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Chris Rossi Posted May 9, 2019 Baller Share Posted May 9, 2019 I set the 67" Senate Pro up at the following: 30 1/2 2.460 6.960 0.775 9 For me personally, I like the bindings at 30 1/4" but I usually recommend starting at 30 1/2". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Ed_Johnson Posted May 9, 2019 Baller Share Posted May 9, 2019 @Chris Rossi ... I have someone I am instructing that just got a 69 Senate Pro. Do you have suggested numbers for that? THX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Chris Rossi Posted May 9, 2019 Baller Share Posted May 9, 2019 @Ed_Johnson I would start with: 31 1/2" 2.460 6.950 0.785 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller_ Wish Posted May 9, 2019 Baller_ Share Posted May 9, 2019 @Chris Rossi sent u a PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Stevie Boy Posted May 9, 2019 Author Baller Share Posted May 9, 2019 @Chris Rossi many thanks for the Info, if only I could ski like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Chris Rossi Posted May 9, 2019 Baller Share Posted May 9, 2019 And if only i could be a "triple panda award recipient" like you! Glad to help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller ToddK Posted May 9, 2019 Baller Share Posted May 9, 2019 @Chris Rossi it looks to me that the only difference in the settings you recommend from Radar's website are .005 less in FD and for you personally 1/4' less on the binding. Can you elaborate on how you feel the ski behaves differently with your setup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller JAS Posted May 10, 2019 Baller Share Posted May 10, 2019 @Chris Rossi despite the fact that my 2018 vapor pro build “68 is my favorite ski of all time I couldn’t resist pulling the trigger on 67” pro build senate this winter. Skiing 32 @34 and at 225 # I’m upper end for the vapor, but thinking that .2 extra width of senate may be the boom! I’ve tried 69” vapor but always come back to 68. Excited to get season started Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Chris Rossi Posted May 10, 2019 Baller Share Posted May 10, 2019 @JAS excited to see what you do on that bad boy! @OldGettingYoung my numbers will allow the ski to roll over slightly more and slide through the finish of the turn more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller C5Quest Posted May 10, 2019 Baller Share Posted May 10, 2019 How about a 2019 Senate in 65....if I can ever find one. Assuming 2020 is same shape I’ll get one then but could use a good start point. That’s is in addition to what’s on the Radar site Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller coach3 Posted May 13, 2019 Baller Share Posted May 13, 2019 @Chris Rossi Does the Lithium core absorb wake shock more than the ProBuild? May not be a concern to most skiers, I just have a bad front knee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.webp.c1d9c97f9cd6aed3eb2f057593d2bd42.webp)
.webp.0a50dd72563036feadeb1f5c10a9e658.webp)
.webp.a30f66e5f4553a0ea06e4fe12520951c.webp)
.webp.8497384650ada8a3e4f1fd5dd6c3fb2a.webp)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now