Baller herseyj Posted October 27, 2018 Baller Share Posted October 27, 2018 Hoping someone out there can help. Just ordered a Goode Revolution in 66.5. The ski says 66.5 but measures 65. They don't even make a 65 or any thing that small. Anyone have one they can compare and measure actual length. They are closed on weekends so I can't get answers from them. Worried this is way shorter than my 67 arc and shorter than anything I've ever skied on. Maybe I should have done the next up. On the edge of sizes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Than_Bogan Posted October 27, 2018 Baller Share Posted October 27, 2018 I can't directly answer your question, but I can say that literal ski length doesn't mean much. Manufacturers know what the right sizes of their skis are for each ability level and skier size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller herseyj Posted October 27, 2018 Author Baller Share Posted October 27, 2018 Just freaking me out I guess and wonder if I should go up a size since I am used to more ski under me or just roll with their measurement size recommendation. 66.5 Revolution on Left 67 D3 Arc-S on right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller jimski Posted October 28, 2018 Baller Share Posted October 28, 2018 I'm 190 lb 5 ft 11 On the 67 and I'm wondering if it may be to big for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller OldboyII Posted October 28, 2018 Baller Share Posted October 28, 2018 I like the idea of shorter ski with the same riding properties - not much space in my car )) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller JackQ Posted October 28, 2018 Baller Share Posted October 28, 2018 The surface area is more important than just the length. On the NanoOne and XT, I was on the 65.25 at 195pds/34mph/35 off. That would now be labeled a 66”, the old 66 is labeled 67. Two years ago, I wanted more ski for shorter line and went to the 66 XT, now the “67” XTR. I am now down to 175pds, 34mph/39. I would concentrate on how the ski performs and feels for you, some like a ski on the small end of the scale, I tend to like a ski that “is too large for me” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller herseyj Posted October 28, 2018 Author Baller Share Posted October 28, 2018 Skied it today and it skied like a much larger ski. Very interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller jayski Posted October 29, 2018 Baller Share Posted October 29, 2018 @jimbrake I am 185-190 6'1" on the 67...would not go shorter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller bishop8950 Posted October 29, 2018 Baller Share Posted October 29, 2018 I would ride a 67” D3 and did so for many years. I am now on a 67.25 Revolution and it feels like exactly the right size. I am 6’ flat and 185. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller ForrestGump Posted October 29, 2018 Baller Share Posted October 29, 2018 In a lot of cases, ski sizes are not a measurement. Instead they're a use case. People have an idea that a 67 is for 170-185lbs. So some companies will name their ski a 67 because the use case is for a 170-185lbs. Other companies will name their ski based on a real measurement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now