Baller JBB Posted November 10, 2017 Baller Share Posted November 10, 2017 Does anyone know the width difference between the HO CX and the TX? I can’t find anything online Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigskieridaho Posted November 10, 2017 Share Posted November 10, 2017 @savaiusini or @MarcusBrown will be your ultimate insight on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Sivota Posted November 10, 2017 Baller Share Posted November 10, 2017 The TX is a fraction wider. I am not sure it has an adjustable fin. Both have been replaced by the Omni line of skis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Jaypro Posted November 10, 2017 Baller Share Posted November 10, 2017 TX is wider and the SL has the adjustable fin box. Awesome ski. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller JBB Posted November 10, 2017 Author Baller Share Posted November 10, 2017 To be fair, I have a CX, and as seen in my previous posts, I have switched to hardshell boots, as a result of/to further prevent injury. Skiing on the CX is a bit aggressive, and causing some pain. I am looking to slow down a bit, to get used to the new equipment. I am trying to decide if TX (The Texas sized CX) is the right move, and wanted to know the width difference is. Ultimately determining how fast i would be out of the ski, and if there is a big performance gap between the CX and teh TX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller JBB Posted November 11, 2017 Author Baller Share Posted November 11, 2017 Perhaps, here’s a question. Is the tax equivlant to the radar theory, or is it more slender? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Sivota Posted November 11, 2017 Baller Share Posted November 11, 2017 Depending on budget I wouldn't rule out the Omni. It is half way between the two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef23 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 @JBB I think the TX is more equivalent to the Senate than the Theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller JBB Posted November 15, 2017 Author Baller Share Posted November 15, 2017 @Chef23 that is very interesting. I thought I read that the CX was more similar to the Senate. Anyone else have some input on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller savaiusini Posted November 15, 2017 Baller Share Posted November 15, 2017 TX is about .25" to .375" wider than CX depending on where you measure. Omni is between the two at 7.047" across the front inserts. From what I recall, Theory is a fair bit wider than all three. Hope this info helps! Sam Avaiusini - HO Sports Company - Director of Inside Sales and Business Operations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallSkinnyGuy Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 The 2016 Senate at the 67" length is 7.043" at max width point, so nearly the same as the Omni. The 2015 Theory (last Theory made) in 67" length is 7.347" at max width point, so probably just a bit wider than the TX. Of course, width is just one factor in the design of a ski. It is probably more telling when comparing mid-level skis to know the manufacturer's recommended max speed than the particular width. The Senate is recommended for a max speed of 34mph while the Theory has a recommended max speed of 32mph. IIRC, the TX suggested max speed is 34mph, so more in line with the Senate. I think the CX also had a recommended max speed of 34mph, too, but I don't know for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller JBB Posted November 15, 2017 Author Baller Share Posted November 15, 2017 Thank you all. I was referencing the Theory, because i have used a friends in the past, and didn't find it responsive enough. I was concerned that the TX was about those widths, and was concerned with the extreme stability that came with the Radar. I don't necessarily need a surfboard like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now