Baller ozski Posted July 1, 2013 Baller Share Posted July 1, 2013 Would it be more interesting to make the steps smaller as the line gets shorter? Rather than jump from 41 to 43 off go 41 - 41.5 - 42 ... Just an idea - opinions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller estrom Posted July 2, 2013 Baller Share Posted July 2, 2013 It is odd that there are 1 1/2 ft. jumps from 38 to 39 1/2 to 41...and then there's a 2 ft. jump to 43. Anyone know the history behind that? Ed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klindy Posted July 2, 2013 Share Posted July 2, 2013 @estrom the cuts are 0.5 meters NOT feet. So to say the line goes from 41 to 43 (two feet) is incorrect. It goes 10.75m (-39) to 10.25m (-41) to 9.75m (-43). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller estrom Posted July 2, 2013 Baller Share Posted July 2, 2013 @klindy, what are these 'meters' you speak of?? ;) Thanks for the clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller ozski Posted July 2, 2013 Author Baller Share Posted July 2, 2013 Well they could still go down by .25 of a meter, it would give the skiers a lot more bouys between 41 and impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klindy Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 The shortening loops AFTER 9.75 (-43) do go down by .25m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller ozski Posted July 3, 2013 Author Baller Share Posted July 3, 2013 They probably said this about 39.5 and 41 but does anyone think 43 is possible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Than_Bogan Posted July 3, 2013 Baller Share Posted July 3, 2013 -43 is absolutely possible. Nothing in the geometry suggests that it isn't, so eventually someone will get there. However, I agree with the implied sentiment that 9.75m is too large of a jump from 10.25m. Regulars are tired of hearing it from me, but insisting on quarter meter granularity at this short is too constraining. 9.9m probably would be more interesting. Then maybe 9.65m after that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller ozski Posted July 3, 2013 Author Baller Share Posted July 3, 2013 Yeah I just look at the video taken of -43 attempts and it looks close to impossible. Possibly if we could breed a 7 foot skier with rubber arms.. Does anyone know how far its been taken in practice? I read Nate has been around 3 ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klindy Posted July 3, 2013 Share Posted July 3, 2013 I believe if a skier can get around 1 & 2 then they can physically get around all 6. The primary reason it "looks close to impossible" is that it's only been attempted a handful of times. The more attempts, the better the skier (and frankly the driver) can figure things out. I predict the record is broken before the end of the summer - at least once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller A_B Posted July 3, 2013 Baller Share Posted July 3, 2013 It would be interesting and eye opening for us Ballers to go 30 mph and try 43 and see what these guys are up against.... I know I have never tried it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller ozski Posted July 3, 2013 Author Baller Share Posted July 3, 2013 @AB - With video please :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now