Baller JC McCavit Posted June 3, 2012 Baller Share Posted June 3, 2012 What adjustment will cause the ski to make a tighter radius turn on both sides of the course? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SkiJay Posted June 3, 2012 Members Share Posted June 3, 2012 In order of most recommended to least: Technique - Turn with your hips further forward over your ankles. Bindings - Try moving your bindings forward on the ski. Fin - Increase fin length in .005" increments. Over-doing this will cost you width and/or make your ski hook up too hard at the finish of your turns (especially on your off-side), breaking you at the waist. Wing - Increase wing angle (will also cost you speed and width). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Than_Bogan Posted June 3, 2012 Baller Share Posted June 3, 2012 First rule of adjustments: For every adjustment recommendation there is an equal and opposite adjustment recommendation. In this case, a lot has to do with exactly why your radius isn't what you want. If the ski feels "loose" and is sliding instead of turning, then increasing fin length (aka lowering the tip) could help. But the more common problem that I personally have had is the skiing "over-tracking" and refusing to start coming around when I want it to. In that scenario, I have been successful by slightly reducing the fin length (aka raising the tip). I recommend 0.01 increments personally. At .005 there are differences, but it's going to be hard to separate what's really happening from what's just in your head. Then again, I've sometimes found that fin experiments make me a better skier even if I end up right back where I started! So that "in your head" thing can be pretty darn useful! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 Hold onto the handle longer, make sure you counter rotate with both hands on the handle as you move out toward the ball. The most common reason most skiers have a large radius is because they lose angle off the 2nd wake and ski towards the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller A_B Posted June 4, 2012 Baller Share Posted June 4, 2012 Fin forward. Boots back. Less depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dusty Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 I've found that improving one side usually affects the other negatively a little. Adding length or moving fin back assists off-side, but may not be so great for my on-side. If you are deep enough already, taking out tail seems to benefit both turns... Countering properly works wonders for both sides without any ski tinkering at all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerR Posted June 4, 2012 Share Posted June 4, 2012 @ab I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller A_B Posted June 4, 2012 Baller Share Posted June 4, 2012 @scotchipman, page 8 of the Goode Technical Manual, at bottom. If your ski is over turning, move the bindings forward. http://www.goode.com/images/wstm050811rev001.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller A_B Posted June 4, 2012 Baller Share Posted June 4, 2012 Always a balancing act. Adding length helps offside but hurts onside, that is why I went with less depth, as this in effect puts the fin longer relative to depth, and less depth makes the ski easier to push around on your onside. At least in my thousand or so fin tweaks, which by all account is ten times more than I should have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller Zman Posted June 4, 2012 Baller Share Posted June 4, 2012 Test Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller A_B Posted June 4, 2012 Baller Share Posted June 4, 2012 Move fin forward a couple thousandths and take out a fuzz of depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Steven_Haines Posted June 5, 2012 Members Share Posted June 5, 2012 It's funny how one thing works well for one guy and the opposite for another. It's definitely a black art! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baller A_B Posted June 6, 2012 Baller Share Posted June 6, 2012 Sure is! I know I have gone out and tried some things that I read in published articles, and came back and re-read them over and over, thinking I surely got it backwards. One thing I do know, is if an adjustment works, do it some more until it doesn't then back off a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Steven_Haines Posted June 6, 2012 Members Share Posted June 6, 2012 Ya, Rossi wrote that article about adjusting for water temp. I'm sure he knows what he's talking about but I found that going in the opposite direction worked for me. It just doesn't seem that there's any rhyme or reason to it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now