Poll: Is John allowed to call himself mediocre?

[Than_Bogan]

I get his new signature, and I definitely find it funny.

 

"most famous mediocre skier in the world"

 

He's definitely more famous that anybody else at his/my level, but can a guy who runs deep -38 on every ski ever made really call himself mediocre?

 

(Hey, I've been working hard this month, but now I'm waiting for a huge database run to see where we stand, so I have nothing better to do...)

[Horton]

My fame to ball count ratio is massive.

[MattP]

Debatable, but I wi tell you for sure when I see him ski in person this coming week. At the moment I find it funny. Now y'all can poke fun at my new signature. When I get some time I might post the stories as to why it is what it is.

[Horton]

No Matt I do not think yours is right.

[MattP]

Party Pooper, watch it I may leave you at the airport.

[jipster43]

I've been wrestling with his descriptor too. Mostly because that makes me sub-mediocre.

[Horton]

OK I may change it. I guess it is important to me that folks not be under the impression that I think I am some world class skier. I am a guy with a long history in the sport and a web site. There are more than a few guys on this forum that run 6+ more balls than I do.

[skidawg]

I think there should b a new poll.....hortons new tag line

[The_MS]

This could get good.

 

[Razorskier1]

I think we should let @Horton call himself whatever he wants. How about "more famous than his buoy count"? After all, he is equal in fame to all the pros out there!

[Horton]

I fixed it. No one will disagree with my signature now.

[TylerR]

@horton I disagree with your new signature based upon the fact that my only claim to fame is my mediocre driving...

[Than_Bogan]

"My fame to ball count ratio is massive. "

 

Now that's a signature.

 

Also reminds me: There's a fine line between numerator and denominator...